LONDON - Should immigrants be obliged to learn the language of their adopted country?
It is a perennial question in Europe, the United States and elsewhere and was raised again on Friday by Ed Miliband, the leader of Britain's opposition Labour Party.
Mr. Miliband, the son of Polish-born Jewish refugees from the Holocaust, said all newcomers to Britain should be expected to learn English and those in taxpayer-funded employment should be required to do so.
Immigration is a political minefield in Britain as it is in other European countries where a growing number of unemployed citizens is chasing a diminishing number of jobs.
Census data published this week showed that 13 percent of the population of England and Wal es was born outside Britain, while only 45 percent of Londoners now describe themselves as âwhite British.â More than two million immigrants arrived in Britain in the past decade.
For many, Mr. Miliband included, the emergence of a multiethnic Britain is something to be celebrated. âI am the son of immigrants. I love Britain,â he said in a closely watched speech. âBut I am not going to shy away from the difficult issues.â
His âOne Nationâ speech, which put the emphasis on the need for integration, was nevertheless seen as a nod in the direction of those who claim that Labour's policies when in power led to uncontrolled immigration and ethnic segregation in parts of Britain.
David Aaronovitch, a broadcaster and columnist for The Times of London, messaged the Labour leader on Twitter to tell him that his English language stipulation was âa bit of a stunt,â and to suggest his speech was an attempt to neutralize the immigration issue for Labour.
Others suggested ahead of the speech that Labour was attempting to ârepositionâ itself on immigration to prevent losing some of its its traditional white, working-class supporters to other parties.
Among practical measures, Mr. Miliband would reduce funding for translation services for immigrants in order to pay for their language classes.
Mr. Miliband's speech came after Theresa May, the Conservative minister in charge of internal affairs, this week referred to the strains brought on by a decade of âuncontrolled mass immigration.â
âYou only have to look at London, where almost half of all primary school children speak English as a second language, to see the challenges we now face as a country to build an integrated, co hesive society,â she told a center-right think tank. âHow can people build relationships with their neighbors if they can't even speak the same language?â
Jonathan Portes in The Guardian suggested the language issue was something of a myth.
âIt is true that almost half of all primary school children in London speak English as a second language,â he wrote. âBut this doesn't mean that they, or their parents, can't speak English with their friends and neighbors.â
He added, âCensus data shows that only one in eight households in London (and one in 25 in the country) don't include someone for whom English is a âmain' language; and even some of those will have people who can communicate perfectly well in English.â
Anecdotal evidence is that young immigrants, or those born in Britain to immigrant parents, usually take responsibility for helpin g older relatives negotiate the challenges of living in an English-speaking society.
The latest data suggest around one million new Londoners do not speak English. It might make practical sense for them to start learning it. But does it matter if they don't?
A visiting friend last week recalled the experience of his grandmother, a multilingual Holocaust survivor who eventually made her home in multicultural New York.
Her six languages did not include English and she decided she did not need to learn it. Yiddish and Spanish turned out to be more than adequate to meet her daily needs.
What do you think? Can newcomers truly be British or American if they don't speak English, or French if they don't speak French? Or are other attributes more essential to integrate in today's multiethnic societies? Let us know your views.