HONG KONG- Another day, another sophisticated and wealthy Chinese-speaking city and another demonstration against China â" outside the Chinese mainland, since the authorities there don't permit protests.
On New Year's Day it was Hong Kong's turn, after Taipei's rally on New Year's Eve, which I wrote about yesterday.
In Hong Kong on Tuesday, tens of thousands of people marched through downtown toward the government headquarters, calling for universal suffrage and for the leader, Leung Chun-ying, to step down, as my colleague Keith Bradsher reports.
Driving both the Taipei and the Hong Kong protests are worries about the loss of freedoms in the face of an increasingly wealthy, yet authoritarian China, while local events were th e immediate catalyst. In Taipei, concerns focused on the construction of media monopolies while in Hong Kong, on the trustworthiness and independence of the city's political leader.
As Mr. Bradsher wrote of the Hong Kong marchers: âCritics of the chief executive, Leung Chun-ying, accuse him of misleading the public on a controversial real estate issue, and of being a puppet installed by Beijing.â
Reflecting that, they carried giant posters of Mr. Leung as Pinocchio with a long, skinny nose, or as a wolf with vulpine teeth (his fiercest critics here call him âthe wolf.â)
Yet thousands of people also rallied to support Mr. Leung. Police figures put the pro-Leung crowd at 8,560, while they put the anti-Leung crowd at 28,500. Organizers gave far higher estimates: 62,500 and 142,000, respectively.
There was some mystery about the identities of the pro-Leung marchers. Cheng Yiu-tong, a prominent politician who helped organize the Hong Kong Celebrati ons Association's pro-Leung march, said they represented the âsilent majorityâ of Hong Kong people.
Yet as the South China Morning Post noted: âWhile marchers opposed to Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying were eager to declare their reasons for protesting, many of the thousands who turned out in a show of support for the administration were reticent,â with some participants replying âno comment' when asked to explain their endorsement of Leung.
The SCMP wasn't sure why, but suggested that one possible motivation: they had been paid to show up, presumably by pro-China forces, though the newspaper didn't spell that out.
âAn investigation by online news portal The House News, which sent reporters undercover to join the rally, suggested one possible motive â" cash handouts of $250 Hong Kong dollars,â (about 32 U.S. dollars,) given, surreally, âby an operative hiding inside a portable toilet.â
However the newspaper noted that marchers questioned about the cash payout denied it, emphasizing they were âself-motivated.â
Fifteen years after Hong Kong's return to Chinese rule, calls for universal suffrage are common here. But adding a definite frisson to the marches was a small but growing pro-independence group numbering in their hundreds, perhaps thousands, who carried two flags: the pre-1997 colonial Hong Kong flag, and an altered version of that which retained the âdragon and lionâ emblem, symbolizing China and Britain, but removed the Union Jack, Britain's flag.
The latter flag is the rallying point of the Hong Kong City-State Autonomy Movement, which has a Facebook page and a Web site. I spoke to Fred Ng, who was carrying a blue, pre-1997 colonial flag. What did it mean to him?
âI think the old, British-ruled Hong Kong was better than today,â said Mr. Ng, a 30-something, online retailer. âPeople had a chance to buy a flat, get a job, to say their own things. But now there's less and less freedom,â he said. âRich people control Hong Kong and citizens can't afford to stay.â
Didn't the flag symbolize colonial humiliation, as Chinese authorities have said? âI don't think it's a problem,â he said. âI think now we still have colonialism. Before it was the British government, now it is the Communist government.â
Christina, 30, who asked her second name not be used for fear of retaliation, sat on a road divider holding a large, 1 by 2-meter âautonomy movementâ flag. It was significant that the movement had removed the Union Jack and added, in Chinese, the words âé¦æ¸¯,âor Hong Kong â" it showed their allegiance to their local identity, she said.
âWe took off the British symbol because we are not ruled by Britain. We want Hong Kong to be ruled by Hong Kong people, by ourselves,â she said. But on balance, before was better, she said.
âBefore we were ruled by a modern, British state. Now we are ruled by a politically underdeveloped government,â she said.
Prominent Chinese former officials with special responsibility for Hong Kong have sharply criticized the autonomy movement, calling its adherents âsheer moronsâ and warning it was âspreading like a virusâ and must be handled firmly, the SCMP reported late last year.