Total Pageviews

Becoming ‘Asia Literate’: Learn Chinese, but Don’t Stop There

BEIJING â€" While studying abroad at Tsinghua University in Beijing, Andrew Mead didn’t expect to find a job at Burton, one of the top snowboarding brands in the world.

“In my spare time on exchange, I would go skateboarding around Beijing with friends, including one who worked at Burton. A few months later, I was offered a job at their Beijing office because of my interest in snowboarding and China,” said Mr. Mead, 23, who is majoring in engineering and finance and speaks some Chinese. He plans to head back to Beijing after he graduates soon from an Australian university.

Governments are increasingly recognizing the opportunities that exist for people like Mr. Mead who are able to marry technical skills or hobbies with “Asian literacy.” Also called “global competence,” it represents an understanding of other cultures and languages; but China isn’t the only nation in Asia and people should also be looking more broadly, to Japan, India and Indonesia, to name just three other places, according to some experts.

In 2009, President Obama announced the “100,000 Strong” initiative to encourage 100,000 students to study abroad in China over four years.

In 2012, the Australian government released a white paper titled “Australia in the Asian Century,” described as “a roadmap showing how Australia can be a winner in the Asian century.”

Outside of government, there has been a burgeoning of other initiatives: language teaching conferences, Facebook groups to connect parents interested in the idea of “Asia literate,” even native Chinese speaking nannies who can command decent salaries.

Yet Asia is a very diverse continent. From the 1970s to the 1990s, “Asian literacy” was mostly about Japan. From the 1990s onwards, the focus shifted to China, as its economy expanded fast.

“Unfortunately, less attention is being paid to many other Asian countries including Japan, India, Pakistan and Indonesia, which are increasingly going to play important roles in the world,” Chris Livaccari, the Director of Education and Chinese Language Initiatives at the Asia Society in New York, said in a telephone interview.

“Global competence is not about speaking Chinese. I worry the United States is putting a tremendous amount of resources into Chinese,” he said. “Thirty years ago we saw this with Japanese. Now, many people who spent all this time learning Japanese are saying ‘Why did I do this? Japan is not as central to the world or my life as it was once perceived to be.’”

And, what does it even mean to be “China literate?” Is it about rattling off fluent Mandarin? Or can it be less than that â€" a basic understanding of Chinese culture and customs, or cuisine? Is it exclusively for a privileged few who can afford the experience of studying abroad? Or can everyone have an opportunity to be “China literate”?

“Asia literacy may just be about encouraging young people to think about Asia as an option for their future, for travel, for a gap year, for a career,” said Angela Merriam, a senior policy analyst at China Policy in Beijing.

For those who do take the leap and learn Chinese, there are both linguistic and cultural barriers. Westerners, accustomed to liberal teaching methods, may complain that Chinese teachers’ style is too rigid.

“Many U.S. school administrators share that there is some level of frustration with Chinese teachers approaching instruction as if they were teaching a group of Chinese children, as opposed to a group of American children,” said Mr. Livaccari.

For teachers who do adapt to American schools and classrooms, it is sometimes a struggle to excite students about China because it lacks the contemporary cultural appeal of Japan and Korea.

Foreigners studying Chinese may find Chinese popular culture difficult to connect to, and television, which can serve as a language-learning tool for Asians in English-speaking countries, offers a diet heavy in bloody, anti-Japanese war dramas and local entertainment that can be difficult to penetrate. But the strength of the Chinese economy and pressure from parents and school districts for schools to offer Chinese language classes trumps China’s lack of soft power.

What about foreigners who live in China and learn to speak the language well? Quite a few say that there’s nothing as annoying as the question, “But how many real Chinese friends do you have?”

“Even though you speak Chinese well, it’s sometimes hard to develop close relationships, Mr. Livaccari said. “It’s about language, but it’s about so much more than language.”

For Mr. Mead, it all started by accident; growing up in Australia, the two Malaysian children at his school were the closest he ever got to Asia. A few years later on a flight home, he noticed the person next to him on the airplane struggling to fill out an immigration card.

“We started chatting,” Mr. Mead said. “He was coming from Yunnan in China to study in Perth and was going to live a few streets away from me. Now he’s one of my best friends. Around that time, I had some elective classes at university so I decided to take the most different class I could think of - Chinese.”

What does being “Asia literate” mean to you? How can there be a shift away from focusing on “China literacy” to “Asia literacy” more broadly? How important is it to learn another language to be “Asia literate”?



Defense Minister May Become a Liability for Merkel

BERLIN â€" This is not going to be an easy week for Chancellor Angela Merkel. Her trusted and long-time friend, Defense Minister Thomas de Maizière is fighting for his political survival because of a deepening scandal over Germany’s development of surveillance drones.

The controversy is inconvenient ahead of President Barack Obama’s visit to Berlin next week, which I discuss in my Page Two column.

The curious thing is that it is not the idea of Germany having drones that has upset the opposition parties. It is the fact that Mr. de Maizière allegedly allowed work on the project to continue at enormous cost despite the fact that the drones would never fly.

Germany had been investing in the Euro Hawk drone, a trans-Atlantic project between Northrop Grumman of the United States and the European aerospace company EADS. The drone was designed to do for the Bundeswehr, Germany’s armed forces, what the high altitude, long endurance surveillance drone Global Hawk does for the United States military.

Last month, Mr. de Maizière acknowledged that the Euro Hawk would never fly. After spending more than €500 million, or $661 million, on the project, Germany plans to abandon it. Mr. de Maizière cited safety concerns. “Better an end with horror than a horror without end,” he told the Bundestag.

Euro Hawk cannot fly because it does not meet the standards of the European Aviation and Safety Agency. High altitude drones need sophisticated equipment that will prevent them from colliding with conventional aircraft, losing control, or becoming lost. For Germany, this would have meant spending an additional €600 million on equipment and experts, in addition to spending more for the certification.

To make things even more difficult for Mr. de Maizière, Norththrop Grumman was not prepared to provide certain technical documents for the certification process â€" despite the long cooperation between Norththrop Grumman, EADS and the German Defense Ministry. Mr. de Maizière said he knew nothing of the program until 2012, even though it had been under development for several years by that time.

The opposition, which is struggling in the opinion polls ahead of federal elections in September, is latching onto the drone scandal to dent Mrs. Merkel’s popularity and target her closest advisor. The longer the scandal continues the more Mrs. Merkel could be put into the uncomfortable position of taking a stand over Mr. de Maizière’s future.



Defense Minister May Become a Liability for Merkel

BERLIN â€" This is not going to be an easy week for Chancellor Angela Merkel. Her trusted and long-time friend, Defense Minister Thomas de Maizière is fighting for his political survival because of a deepening scandal over Germany’s development of surveillance drones.

The controversy is inconvenient ahead of President Barack Obama’s visit to Berlin next week, which I discuss in my Page Two column.

The curious thing is that it is not the idea of Germany having drones that has upset the opposition parties. It is the fact that Mr. de Maizière allegedly allowed work on the project to continue at enormous cost despite the fact that the drones would never fly.

Germany had been investing in the Euro Hawk drone, a trans-Atlantic project between Northrop Grumman of the United States and the European aerospace company EADS. The drone was designed to do for the Bundeswehr, Germany’s armed forces, what the high altitude, long endurance surveillance drone Global Hawk does for the United States military.

Last month, Mr. de Maizière acknowledged that the Euro Hawk would never fly. After spending more than €500 million, or $661 million, on the project, Germany plans to abandon it. Mr. de Maizière cited safety concerns. “Better an end with horror than a horror without end,” he told the Bundestag.

Euro Hawk cannot fly because it does not meet the standards of the European Aviation and Safety Agency. High altitude drones need sophisticated equipment that will prevent them from colliding with conventional aircraft, losing control, or becoming lost. For Germany, this would have meant spending an additional €600 million on equipment and experts, in addition to spending more for the certification.

To make things even more difficult for Mr. de Maizière, Norththrop Grumman was not prepared to provide certain technical documents for the certification process â€" despite the long cooperation between Norththrop Grumman, EADS and the German Defense Ministry. Mr. de Maizière said he knew nothing of the program until 2012, even though it had been under development for several years by that time.

The opposition, which is struggling in the opinion polls ahead of federal elections in September, is latching onto the drone scandal to dent Mrs. Merkel’s popularity and target her closest advisor. The longer the scandal continues the more Mrs. Merkel could be put into the uncomfortable position of taking a stand over Mr. de Maizière’s future.



Former Dutch Leader Steps Into U.S. Nukes Debate

LONDON â€" In a report that caused some consternation in the Netherlands on Monday, a former prime minister was said to have confirmed for the first time that American Cold War-era nuclear bombs are being stored on Dutch soil.

De Telegraaf quoted Ruud Lubbers, prime minister from 1982 to 1994, as saying 22 weapons were stored in underground strong rooms at the Volkel Air Base in Brabant.

The newspaper said experts had identified the weapons referred to by Mr. Lubbers as B61 gravity nuclear bombs.

“I would never have thought those silly things would still be there in 2013,” Mr. Lubbers was quoted as saying. “I think they are an absolutely pointless part of a tradition in military thinking.”

Although the presence of the tactical nuclear weapons had long been regarded as an open secret, their existence was never officially confirmed and Monday’s report prompted swift reaction on Dutch social media.

Raymond Le Blanc posted on Twitter from the province of North Brabant:

Mr. Lubbers made his revelation in a National Geographic documentary, according to De Telegraaf. It comes amid a controversy over a perceived U-turn by the Obama administration on nuclear weaponry.

A New York Times editorial on May 26 challenged the wisdom of an administration proposal to spend more than half a billion dollars to upgrade B61s, which it described as “the detritus of the Cold War.”

The editorial, titled “Throwing Money at Nukes,” argued that “the B61 upgrade would significantly increase America’s tactical nuclear capability and send the wrong signal while Mr. Obama is trying to draw Russia into a new round of nuclear reduction talks that are supposedly aimed at cutting tactical, as well as strategic, arsenals.”

The weapons reported to be in the Netherlands are believed to be part of an arsenal that was also deployed in Belgium, Germany, Italy and Turkey to protect NATO allies from the former Soviet Union’s advantage in conventional arms.

A memo published by WikiLeaks in 2010 appeared to confirm long-standing rumors that American nuclear weapons were stored on Dutch soil.

Said to be written in 2009 by Philip D. Murphy, the American ambassador to Germany, it read, “a withdrawal of nuclear weapons from Germany and perhaps from Belgium and the Netherlands could make it very difficult politically for Turkey to maintain its own stockpile.”

At that time, the Dutch government declined to comment.

Mr. Lubbers was co-author of a 2009 article that said the Netherlands had “gratefully benefited from the nuclear protection of the United States.” But it is now time to support President Barack Obama in the goal of achieving a world without nuclear weapons, Mr. Lubbers and his co-authors wrote.

More recently, however, Mr. Obama has been accused of reneging on the pledge with the plan to upgrade the Europe-based nuclear arsenal.

It would involve nearly 200 B61 bombs being given new tail fins to turn them into guided weapons that could be delivered by stealth F35 fighter-bombers, it was reported in April.



IHT Quick Read: June 10

NEWS A 29-year-old former C.I.A. computer technician went public on Sunday as the source behind the daily drumbeat of disclosures about the nation’s surveillance programs, saying he took the extraordinary step because “the public needs to decide whether these programs and policies are right or wrong.” Mark Mazzetti and Michael S. Schmidt report from Washington.

Booz Allen Hamilton, the employer of the man who says he leaked data on surveillance programs in the United States, has become one of the largest corporations in the United States- almost exclusively by serving the government. Binyamin Appelbaum and Eric Lipton report from Washington.

North and South Korea agreed to hold high-level talks this week to discuss reopening their joint operation of an industrial complex on the border, as well as other economic and humanitarian projects that have faltered amid tensions built by nuclear tests and threats of war. Choe Sang-Hun reports from Seoul.

President Obama and his Chinese counterpart, Xi Jinping, emerged from talks determined to avoid the pitfalls of a rising power confronting an established one. David E. Sanger reports from Washington.

Flooding continues to ravage Central and Eastern Europe as the Danube, the Elbe and several tributaries continue to rise across multiple countries. Palko Karasz reports from Budapest and Melissa Eddy from Berlin.

After deadly weekend clashes, signs emerged that Libyans’ shock at the violence against civilians might weaken the influence of the country’s miliita leaders. David D. Kirkpatrick reports from Benghazi, Libya.

EDUCATION The Council for Assisting Refugee Academics, now 80 years old, has been helping the persecuted since the rise of the Nazis before World War II. D.D. Guttenplan reports from London.

ARTS “Kinky Boots” pulled off an upset win for best musical at the Tony Awards on Sunday, while Christopher Durang’s play “Vanya and Sonia and Masha and Spike” won for best play. Patrick Healy reports.

Eventually, 3D printers will be producing some of the nuts, bolts and the future tools of design. Alice Rawsthorn writes from London.

SPORTS Rafael Nadal on Sunday became the first man in history to win eight singles tennis titles at the same Grand Slam tournament when he beat David Ferrer in three sets at the French Open. Christopher Clarey reports from Paris.

The Kentucky Derby, Preakness and Belmont winners, along with their handlers, represent the good in horse racing and give the sport a summer to look forward to. Joe Drape reports.