Total Pageviews

What of the Ringleaders, Chinese Ask About Cultural Revolution Case

BEIJING â€" It’s reminiscent, perhaps, of the trials of people accused of Nazi-era crimes, a John Demjanjuk, or a Samuel K.: in China this week, a man was tried for murdering a doctor during the Cultural Revolution, the China News Service reported.

A rare episode of justice for a neglected era Judging by a discussion on Chinese microblogs, ordinary people don’t necessarily see it just that way; rather, they are angry that a little guy, and not the masterminds of the violence, is being punished. What about the “ringleaders,” chief among them Mao Zedong, they are saying, often obliquely

According to the report, which was widely disseminated online via news aggregators and other sits, the defendant at the rare trial this week, in Ruian in Zhejiang province, was a 80-plus-year-old man identified only as Mr. Qiu. He strangled a Mr. Hong with a rope in 1967, on the orders of a civilian militia, which suspected Mr. Hong of spying for a rival militia, the report said. Mr. Qiu had been on the run for decades and was arrested last July.

(For an English-language account, see this article in the South China Morning Post, which may be behind a paywall.)

After the killing Mr. Qiu cut off Mr. Hong’s lower legs with a shovel “to make it easier to bury him,” and then he buried him, the report said.

Violence was common during the era: yesterday, I examined this painful time in a Letter from China and Rendezvous post about Ping Fu, the businesswoman who wrote a controversial memoir.

As I wrote in my Letter, to this day, the state tightly controls discussion about the era - when many got away with, literally, murder, including very senior officials. At least some netizens know it, and are pointing out the problem.

“Actually, the biggest criminals of the Cultural Revolution have not been held responsible,” wrote a person with the handle Keji huangdan menwei chuangxin. “To pursue an ordinary criminal, decades later, is absurd.”

“Have the main culprits who started the Cultural Revolution been punished” asked a person with the handle Sansu dage, who added an angry red face to the posting.

A_Jing wrote: “There should be mandatory courses in universities to talk clearly about the crimes against humanity during the Cultural Revolution!”

Wrote another: “All the cases from the Cultural Revolution should be tried.”

p>That’s extremely unlikely. A few key players were tried beginning in 1980, when Jiang Qing, Mao Zedong’s wife, and other members of the Gang of Four received lengthy sentences.

Yet, “I was Chairman Mao’s dog,” Ms. Jiang said in her defense. “Whomever he told me to bite, I bit.”



Carbon Trading Program Falters in Europe

LONDON â€" Just as President Barack Obama is trying to persuade Americans that a cap and trade system is the way to curb carbon emissions, the world’s flagship program in Europe is in danger of failing. The price of carbon traded in Europe has collapsed to around 5 euros per metric ton compared with 30 euros a few years ago, as I discuss in my Green column.

The EU Emissions Trading System is intended to set a price on greenhouse gas emissions in order to force polluters like steel mills and power stations to clean up their acts. In the European union, factories and other installations whose smoke stacks spew carbon dioxide into the atmosphere must either acquire or be allocated pemits each year equivalent to the amount they emit. For instance, Luxembourg-based ArcelorMittal, the world’s largest steelmaker, was allocated about 87 million tons in permits last year.

The number of permits available each year is supposed to gradually decrease, squeezing emissions down. Industrialists moan about this, but the system has actually been very permissive â€" even a money maker for them. Largely because of the recession, the number of permits allocated has turned out to be far too great. Companies have cut back production because of lower demand and have ended up with surplus permits, which they have been selling. That has been one of the key reasons why prices of the permits, which are traded on exchanges just like oil and other commodities, have dropped so much.

The current low price undercuts the purpose of the trading program â€" which was to encourage companies to invest in energy efficient technologies. Single-digit prices don’t encourage companies to do anything, ! analysts say. A much higher price is needed to force change â€" say 30 or 40 euros per ton or even higher.

All of this raises questions about whether a cap and trade program like the European Union’s is the best way to reduce emissions. Advocates say that the simplest way to cut greenhouse gases is to set a high carbon price and then let polluters make decisions about how to do it. That way governments are not picking technologies that may or may not work. But as Europe’s experience has shown, getting carbon pricing right is not easy.

I am interested in hearing from readers on this subject. Do you think that carbon pricing is the best way to cut greenhouse gases or do you have a better suggestion



True or False The Tussle Over Ping Fu\'s Memoir

Did Ping Fu, a prominent Chinese-American businesswoman and author of a recent memoir, “Bend, not Break”, make up her horrible experiences during the 1966-76 Cultural Revolution in order to gain United States citizenship Did they help her become an American by claiming political asylum

That’s what her critics, many of them fellow Chinese Americans, say. It’s an accusation that can stick. As a recent New York Times investigation showed, claiming persecution has spawned an immigration industry involving lawyers prepping client to make false asylum claims.

As I write in my Letter from China this week, Ms. Fu is being accused of making up a lot of things in her memoir. She’s also a successful entrepreneur: the U.S. government honored the founder of the software company Geomagic (in the process of being sold to 3D Systems) with a “2012 Outstanding American by Choice” award.

Ms. Fu is on the board of the White House’s National Advisory Council on Innovation and Entrepreneurship, and is a member of the National Council on Women in Technology, according to the Web site of the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.

Ms. Fu, who says in her memoir she was “quietly deported” to the U.S. in 1984 for writing about female infanticide while still a college student, denies the accusations. But until now she hadn’t explained in public how she became an American.

In an interview with the International Herald Tribune, she said, apparently for the first time, the reason she kept quiet was she was trying to protect her first husband, an American, whom she does not mention in her memoir. The marriage took place while she was living in California! , she said.

“I had a first marriage and that’s how I got my green card,” she said by telephone. She married on Sept. 1, 1986 and divorced three years later. Until now she had kept silent because of a “smear” campaign against her online, mostly by fellow Chinese who accuse her of lying, which extended to real-life harassment, she said: “They smear my name, they try to get my daughter’s name on the Internet, they sent people to Shanghai to surround my family and to Nanjing to harass my neighbors.” She said the accusers, who are “angry” for reasons she doesn’t really understand, contacted U.S. immigration authorities to challenge her award and her citizenship, as well as shareholders of 3D Systems to warn them she was a “liar,” and not to buy Geomagic. Her second husband, Herbert Edelsbrunner, whom she has since divorced, received many “hate emails,” she said. “I just don’t want to hurt innocent people.”

If a first, unpublicized marriage might lay to rest one conentious issue, there are others. Some were the result of exaggeration or unclear communication with her ghost-writer, Los Angeles-based MeiMei Fox, she said.

In the interview, she volunteered an example of an error: a widely criticized account of the ‘‘period police,’’ the authorities who checked a woman’s menstrual cycle to ensure she wasn’t pregnant in the early days of the one-child policy. To stop women substituting others’ sanitary pads for inspection, they were sometimes required to use their own finger to show blood. Through a misunderstanding with Ms. Fox, Ms. Fu said this was portrayed as the use of other people’s fingers - an invasion of the woman’s body.

Ms. Fox “wrote it wrong,’’ she said. ‘‘I corrected it three times but it didn’t get corrected.’’ Women used their own finger to show blood, she said, but the mistake went into print anyway.

In general, Ms. Fox may have ‘‘just made some searches on the Internet that maybe weren’t cor! rect,’â! €™ said Ms. Fu.

Chiefly the errors involved use of the words ‘‘all, never, any,’’ that generalized unacceptably, Ms. Fu said. And, ‘‘She doesn’t know China’s geography,’’ said Ms. Fu.

At the beginning of her memoir, Ms. Fu writes of being kidnapped by a Vietnamese-American on arrival in the U.S. state of New Mexico and locked in his apartment to care for his very young children, whose mother had left, in a bizarre incident. A spokeswoman at the Albuquerque Police Department’s Records Office, where the alleged kidnapping took place, said she could not locate such an incident in their records. Asked about it, Ms. Fu repeated that she did not press charges as, fresh from China, she was terrified of all police, “So I don’t know how they keep records, if there is no criminal charges or record.”

And in an email to me, she admitted she made mistakes about a magazine she said she helped edit, called Wugou, or “No Hook,” produced in 1979 by students at her college, ten called the Jiangsu Teacher’s College (later it changed its name to Suzhou University, she said.) It was not that magazine but another one, “This Generation,” that was taken to a meeting in Beijing of student magazine writers from around the country, she wrote in the email. “A good case that shows everyone’s memory can be wrong,” she wrote.

But bigger questions about the scale of the online vitriol from parts of the Chinese and Chinese-American community remain. “I really haven’t known China for 20-something years, and it didn’t occur to me that what I wrote would generate so much anger,” she said. In the last years, “as China got stronger, nationalistic views got stronger,” she said, making a “civil conversation” about disagreements apparently harder.
Additional reporting by Cindy Hao in Seattle



U.S. Tycoon Savages Work-shy French Workers

LONDON â€" Many in France are bristling over a letter from Maurice M. Taylor, the American tire tycoon, describing French employees as underworked and overpaid.

Writing to a government minister to explain why he would not step in to save a tire factory threatened with closure in northern France, Mr. Taylor, the chief executive of Illinois-based Titan International, recalled visiting the factory: “The French workforce gets paid high wages but works only three hours.

“They get one hour for breaks and lunch, talk for three, and work for three. I told this to the French union workers to their faces. They told me that’s the French way!”

Mr. Taylor, who glories in a Wall Street nickname â€" The Grizz â€" that reflects his tough negotiating style, was writing to Arnaud Montebourg, France’s minister for industrial renewal, to explain why he would not be stepping in to savethe doomed Goodyear plant in the northern town of Amiens.

“How stupid do you think we are” he asked the minister in the February 8 letter, a facsimile of which was published on Tuesday by Les Echos, the French business daily.

His blast touched a raw nerve in France, where both politicians and the press are sensitive to Anglo-Saxon lectures about the country’s alleged anti-business culture.

“Virulent”, “unbelievable” and “incendiary” were among the adjectives used by the French press to describe Mr. Taylor’s missive in which he told Mr. Montebourg:

“You’re a politician so you don’t want to rock the boat. The Chinese are shipping tires into France - really all over Europe - and yet you do nothing.”

Mr. Taylor, a former welder who made a self-financed bid for the Republican presidential nomination in 1996, had already ruffled French feathers back in December when he said he was pulling out of a possible Amiens deal.

Referring to the regulatory barriers Titan had faced, he attacked France’s business practices as “screwed up” and said “only a non-business person would understand the French labor rules.”

France’s Socialist government nevertheles continued to see Mr. Taylor as a potential white knight who would take over at least the profitable part of Goodyear’s operations in Amiens, where workers have waged a five-year campaign to keep the plant open.

Titan’s potential involvement received a hostile reception from France’s General Confederation of Labor (C.G.T.), which demanded a five-year guarantee of continuing production. Goodyear said late last month it planned to close the loss-making plant, costing more than 1,000 jobs.

Daniel Schneidermann, a columnist for the @rrêt sur images Web site, said on Wednesday, “The Grizz doesn’t care whether he’s loved or hated. He reveals globalization in its true colors. He does it a thousand times better than all Michael Moore’s movies. Thank you, the Grizz.”